NeurIPS 2026 · Evaluations & Datasets Track

Isharah-Selfie Continuous Sign Language Recognition Dataset for One-handed Signing

Ahmed Abul Hasanaath, Murtadha Aljubran, Sarah Alyami, Muhammad Haris Khan, Hamzah Luqman

King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM)

8,997sentence-level video clips
1,493unique sentences
16signers
12.5 hof handheld footage
Abstract

Sign language, the way people actually film it

Current sign language recognition and translation benchmarks are commonly collected in controlled settings with fixed or studio-style cameras, which limits how well they reflect everyday mobile communication. This gap is especially visible for Arabic Sign Language (ArSL), the primary sign language used across Arab countries.

Isharah-Selfie is a large-scale Saudi Sign Language (SSL) dataset recorded entirely with front-facing smartphone cameras under unconstrained selfie conditions: one-handed signing, close-range viewpoints, partial body visibility, camera motion, and heterogeneous device resolutions. Every clip carries gloss annotations for CSLR and Arabic translations for SLT, and we define signer-independent and unseen-sentences protocols to test generalization. Benchmarks show that current RGB- and pose-based methods struggle in this setting, especially on novel sentence compositions.

Motivation

When one hand is holding the phone

Deaf signers commonly use the front camera to talk to deaf and hearing people and to share on social media. Members of the local Deaf community confirmed that one-handed signing is normal in short, informal smartphone interactions.

Conventional CSLR data

Fixed camera · studio / broadcast
  • Both hands visible and free
  • Wide framing, full signing space
  • Static camera, consistent resolution
  • Controlled background and lighting

Isharah-Selfie

Handheld · front-facing smartphone
  • Non-dominant hand removed (holds the phone)
  • Reduced signing space, close-range perspective distortion
  • Frequent hand–face occlusion, partial body visibility
  • Camera motion, 480p–4K, unconstrained scenes

Illustrative sketch. Example: “thank you for help” signed two-handed (top row in paper, Fig. 2) vs. one-handed selfie (bottom row).

Real phone capture

14 iPhones across multiple models, one Samsung, one TECNO; focal lengths 2.69–2.87 mm.

Systematic one-handed signing

Only 2.7% of frames show both hands; 65.7% show a single hand.

Gloss + Arabic

Every clip has sign-level gloss sequences and natural Arabic sentence translations.

Dataset construction

From sentence design to verified clips

Sentence selection

1,493 sentences designed with domain experts across seven everyday domains, refined and cross-validated by certified sign language experts.

Data collection

Signers hold the phone in one hand and record 15–25 sentences per session. Each sentence gets ≥5 recordings; a certified ArSL expert records the reference.

Segmentation

Signers pause 2–3 s with hands out of frame; MediaPipe hand-detection gaps mark boundaries for semi-automatic sentence clipping.

Annotation & QA

Two experts annotate gloss and Arabic text. Clips are checked against the reference; deviations are re-recorded or re-verified.

Signers

8 Deaf, 6 hearing ArSL translators, 2 hard-of-hearing. 11 male, 5 female, aged 21–50. Some wear masks or niqab. All gave informed consent and were compensated.

Recording guidance

Portrait orientation, practical selfie distance, signing hand and upper body kept visible, camera movement minimized. Varied clothing, backgrounds and lighting across sessions.

Quality control

Re-recording when the upper body was insufficiently visible or hands left the frame, plus checks on sign order and semantic content.

Statistics

What’s inside

Frame-level hand state

MediaPipe detections over all frames
  • Right hand only49.1%
  • Left hand only16.6%
  • Both hands2.7%
  • No hands31.6%

Video resolution

Share of recordings (most common: 1080p and 4K)
  • 1920×108037.5%
  • 3840×216025%
  • 1280×72012.5%
  • 848×48012.5%
  • 480×8486.25%
  • 1080×19206.25%

Sentence domains

Share of the 1,493 sentences
Healthcare
24.2%
Transport & airports
24.1%
Education
12.2%
Finance
12.1%
Justice / courts
12.0%
Emergency
7.8%
Daily interactions
7.6%

Signer demographics

16 signers
Deaf
50%
Hearing translators
37.5%
Hard-of-hearing
12.5%
Male
68.8%
Female
31.3%
Age 31–40
56.3%
Evaluation protocols

Two ways to test generalization

Signer-independent

Disjoint signers across splits: 11 train (5,997 videos), 3 dev (1,500), 4 test (1,500). Sentences overlap, so models must learn signer-invariant representations.

Unseen-sentences

Dev and test sentences never appear in training (8,356 / 330 / 311 videos; 49 and 50 novel sentences). Known glosses must be recombined into new utterances.

Gloss (CSLR)SI TrainSI DevSI TestUS TrainUS DevUS Test
Videos5,9971,5001,5008,356330311
Unique sentences1,4761,0734931,3774950
Avg. length4.023.603.283.725.584.96
Vocabulary961814497959113129
OOV (%)–0.00.0–1.770.78

SI = signer-independent, US = unseen-sentences. Arabic-text OOV in the unseen split is much higher (41.35% dev, 30.37% test), reflecting greater lexical variability for SLT.

Benchmarks

A genuinely hard problem

Nine published models, evaluated with their original configurations (mT0-xl replaces the LLM in SLT baselines to support Arabic).

ModelSI DevSI TestUS DevUS Test
RGB-based
TLP55.8755.3074.5175.92
Swin-MSTP84.6185.0185.4988.07
USTM85.0087.3386.3187.72
CorrNet+40.1039.8368.6468.29
SlowFastSign70.3666.6383.9184.05
Pose-based
MSLR-Pose58.4860.9883.9184.05
VIPL-SLP69.1067.0980.6979.44

Word error rate (%), lower is better. Best result in each column highlighted.

Citation

Cite this work

COMING SOON

The BibTeX entry will be available once the paper is published.

Build sign language tech that works in your pocket

Isharah-Selfie is available for non-commercial research under a signed usage agreement.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) for its support of this work. We also thank the signers and sign language experts who contributed to the dataset.